- Mark movie as favorite
- Dislike this movie
- Add movie to watchlist
- Mark movie as owned
- Check movie
- View the official lists that include King Kong
- Visit IMDb page
King Kong (1933)'s comments - page 2
- In lists (1018)
- Comments (22)
- Checks (27497)
- Favorites (1046)
Add your comment
Comments 16 - 22 of 22
mittensjackson butchered this movie in his remake. like most people my age, i saw the remake first. now, watching the original, i can see how it went downhill. the kong in the remake doesnt have the character of the original, and the entire remake is based around action scenes and the people fighting against the monsters. one thing the remake did get right is all the scenes with the natives. think about it, if you were black, and some white guys came to your island uninvited and started filming you and insulting your god, you wouldnt want to talk, you would want to fight. in the original, why dont we see the sailors fighting the natives. it would have been much more interesting than the longwinded part where the natives try to negotiate swapping women.
Scratch47Amazing effects, short and sharp, great fun. But I actually prefer Jacksons' more melodramatic, bloated, glorious remake. :D
tylerdurdenI agree. Great speciall effects for its time. But also subpar acting and screenplay
EnggarBIt was 80 years ago. Of course, no CGI, they used stop-motion. But,the plot is pretty good..the story is same with King Kong (2005). So according the movie, King Kong is from Nias , Indonesia. But native Nias in this film dressed like Asmat of Papua. Because it was made in 1933, so this cultural incorrectness is forgivable. No Google.com or Wikipedia at that time.
Deusoverrated fulish story
tommy_leazaqIt wasnt aeroplanes.. It was beauty killed the beast..!! One of the best dialouges ever... :-)
george4monkunggi: i agree with you it was alright definitely good for its time! but nothing compared to the 2005 remake!!
Showing items 16 – 22 of 22