Pssst, want to check out Rosemary's Baby in our new look?
Information
- Year
- 1968
- Runtime
- 137 min.
- Director
- Roman Polanski
- Genres
- Drama, Horror
- Rating *
- 8.0
- Votes *
- 130,813
- Checks
- 35,317
- Favs
- 3,003
- Dislikes
- 205
- Favs/checks
- 8.5% (1:12)
- Favs/dislikes
- 15:1
Top comments
-
kaffy
The true dread and horror of this movie comes from the lack of autonomy some women experienced while pregnant. So many of Rosemary's choices are taken out of her hands by her domineering husband, a parade of crones whose knowledge is assumed by merit of their age, and her doctor of course, all in the name of "what's best for her." Watching a woman say yes to what she knows is wrong in her heart because refusing or contacting the outside world is simply not an option is about as scary as it gets for me. 10 years 3 months ago -
Timec
poiatica - Hey, poiatica, your criticisms are idiotic.
"And the whole, I had sex with you while you were sleeping... Hey, Roman Polansky, have you heard of conjugal rape"
Hey, poiatica, do you know anything about the history of laws regarding conjugal rape? Up until very recently (as in the past 20 or 30 years), "conjugal rape" wasn't even a recognized crime in many places in the world, including much of the United States - it was generally believed that the husband had the "right" to have sex with his wife at any time. And even if it was already a law in New York in 1968, there would still have been a lot of women unwilling to prosecute their husbands for it (that's still a problem to this day.)
Besides all that, your "criticism" is made even more nonsensical by the fact that the sleep rape scene is presently as something that is clearly supposed to be frightening and twisted, and it clearly unsettles Rosemary herself. In other words, Polanski, though he is a creep and a rapist, definitely isn't using this film to condone drugging one's wife and then having sex with her (or allowing someone else to rape her.)
Your "argument" that the scene is evidence of Polanski's twisted mind, his creepiness, and his inability to distinguish rape from consensual sex is further demolished by the fact that this scene is not an invention of that "sexist jackass" at all - rather, it's taken very directly from Levin's novel (and there's no prosecution for "conjugal rape" in that one either.)
Even your claim of the film's sexism is rather dubious. Rosemary is naive, yes (but not any moreso than the female and male protagonists of lots of other horror films) - but after all, the full story of what has happened to her is so twisted that it's unlikely anyone would have guessed it. That she figures out as much as she does actually shows her to be quite intelligent.
And in order for claims of sexism to stick, there has to be a gap in the way the men and women are portrayed (men are good and smart, women are dumb and malevolent, etc.) - however, that's not the case with this film. The men and women of the coven are equally conniving and manipulative and evil, and Rosemary's husband is shown to be willing to do anything to have success in his career, even at the expense of others' lives. That's not a positive portrayal of men or women. Additionally, both men and women make up the small group of characters in the film who are good, insightful, and helpful.
Here's the thing: Many valid complaints can be made about the film - yours just aren't among those "valid complaints." You didn't like the film, and that's perfectly fine, but that doesn't mean that every bad thing you can think of to say about must be valid. 12 years 11 months ago -
neiba
Rosemary's Baby is a gruesome and intense story adapted for the big screen by the Polish director Roman Polanski, from the novel with the same name by Ira Levin. Although it does not contain the elements that traditionally compose a horror movie (blood, sudden shock-moments, etc.) this film is a masterpiece of its genre because it does not depend on these same elements to create a truly frightening and unsettling atmosphere.
Guy (John Cassavetes) and Rosemary Woodhouse (Mia Farrow) are a young couple facing a promising life together. Guy is an actor looking for his big break and Rosemary longs to be a mother. The two just moved into an apartment in the heart of Manhattan where they have as neighbors Roman (Sydney Blackmer) and Minnie Castavet (Ruth Gordon), a caring but nosy elderly couple. Guy develops a close relationship to his neighbors while his wife does not feel very comfortable around them.
Finally, Rosemary’s much desired pregnancy happens but brings unexpected complications: the young woman begins to lose weight and to feel excruciating pains in her stomach.
A series of unusual events, strange noises coming from the apartment next door and a strange obsession revealed by Minnie for her pregnancy, lead Rosemary to a state of complete distrust on those around her and fear for the baby that she’s carrying.
This whole storyline is framed perfectly by Polanski. The unsettling and gloomy atmosphere present throughout the film is immediately introduced by the strange lullaby sung by Mia Farrow during the opening credits.
The architecture, decoration and lightning of the settings create in the viewer a constant sense of claustrophobia and the confusing succession of screenshots in some moments - particularly during the odd nightmare of Rosemary - implement in the public an almost asphyxiating feeling of anxiety that lasts for several hours after the end of the movie.
In general, all the actors are very convincing in their roles and contribute a lot in creating a great familiarity between the viewer and the scene. However, there are two representations that stand out: Mia Farrow is brilliant in the role of the innocent young pregnant woman, fragile and submissive, personality to which his avant-garde pixie hair cut offers an interesting counterpoint, and Ruth Gordon offers a sublime interpretation of the comic yet sinister Minnie Castavet.
Roman Polanski leads the suspense masterfully, revealing the whole plot progressively, creating a very intimate connection between the viewer and the main character. This turns to be particularly brilliant when, instead of ending the film with some unexpected and shocking happening, he chooses a predictable but inevitable conclusion, as if we all knew bad things were meant to happen and there was no way out. This makes the story even scarier.
Personally, I don’t like to feel anxious and scared, so to say that I have suffered every second of this film is the best thing I can say about it. It is undoubtedly one of the greatest masterpieces in the history of horror cinema and a must for all lovers of the genre. 9 years 8 months ago
Friends
Login to see which of your friends have seen this movie!Activity
See more activityIn 21 official lists
-
This movie ranks #8 in IMDb's Horror Top 50
IMDb's Horror Top 50
8 -
This movie ranks #9 in AFI's 100 Years...100 Thrills
AFI's 100 Years...100 Th…
9 -
This movie ranks #12 in TSZDT's The 1,000 Greatest Horror Films
TSZDT's The 1,000 Greate…
12 -
This movie ranks #27 in Tim Dirks's 100+ Most Controversial Films of All-Time
Tim Dirks's 100+ Most Co…
27 -
This movie ranks #35 in IMDb's 1960s Top 50
IMDb's 1960s Top 50
35 -
This movie ranks #39 in Stanley Kubrick, Cinephile
Stanley Kubrick, Cinephi…
39 -
This movie ranks #44 in MovieSense 101
MovieSense 101
44 -
This movie ranks #78 in Empire's The 500 Greatest Movies of All Time
Empire's The 500 Greates…
78 -
This movie ranks #79 in iCheckMovies's 1960s Top 100
iCheckMovies's 1960s Top…
79 -
This movie ranks #170 in Emma Beare's 501 Must-See Movies
Emma Beare's 501 Must-Se…
170 -
This movie ranks #175 in TSPDT's 1,000 Greatest Films
TSPDT's 1,000 Greatest F…
175 -
This movie ranks #286 in Sight & Sound's The Greatest Films of All Time
Sight & Sound's The Grea…
286 -
This movie ranks #348 in Jennifer Eiss's 500 Essential Cult Movies
Jennifer Eiss's 500 Esse…
348 -
This movie ranks #485 in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
1001 Movies You Must See…
485 -
This movie ranks #572 in Jonathan Rosenbaum's Essential Cinema
Jonathan Rosenbaum's Ess…
572 -
This movie ranks #663 in Library of Congress's National Film Registry
Library of Congress's Na…
663 -
This movie ranks #696 in David Thomson's Have You Seen?
David Thomson's Have You…
696 -
This movie ranks #733 in The New York Times's Book of Movies
The New York Times's Boo…
733 -
This movie ranks #753 in The Criterion Collection
The Criterion Collection
753 -
This movie ranks #763 in The Guardian's 1000 Films to See Before You Die
The Guardian's 1000 Film…
763 -
This movie ranks #856 in Time Out's 1000 Films to Change Your Life
Time Out's 1000 Films to…
856