Check
- Mark movie as favorite
- Dislike this movie
- Add movie to watchlist
- Mark movie as owned
- Check movie
- View the official lists that include Star Trek Into Darkness
- Visit IMDb page
Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)'s comments
Order by:
- Info
- In lists (360)
- Comments (46)
- Friends
- Activity
- Checks (22948)
- Favorites (1001)
Add your comment
Comments 1 - 15 of 46
Earring72
Exciting adventure....but understand critics that it doesnt feel like a Star Trek movie but I enjoyed it. Although the first reboot is much better!lunalight
my favourite film!I really wasnt into sci fi before this, but this has to be one of the best movies i have ever saw. The ending ALMOST made me cry. And that is very hard to do.
Cant wait for the third one!
dream_tiger
Overproduced, oversaturated garbage. A bunch of yelling and emotional urgency with no substance. This is a movie produced soley for Apple, Google, Facebook employees and the rest of the tech/Silicon valley industry, Will Wheaton worshipping, Call of Duty/Mass Effect generation. Designed with the products they make, virally talked (advertised) about with the networks they run. It's a product, nothing more. A turd with diamonds sprinkled on it. Its a movie in the same sense that Fox News is news.Cumberbach had several great scenes though.
Im avoiding all Abrams movies from now on.
fonz
If you saw the original series (TV or movie), you probably think this sucks. If your only exposure to Star Trek is via the JJ Abrams lens-flare extravaganza, then you might think this is totes the greatest thing eva.Personally, I think it is as emotionless and unexpressive as a Vulcan despite the fact that I have seen the original Wrath of Khan of which this is a carbon copy of. I have never watched any of the Star Trek tv series but I am slowly working my way through the entire film series. All that jazz about how this new modern cast is going for something else entirely, something their own. Bullshit. Every character in this turd is exactly the same as their namesake from the older film series. Right down to their mannerisms and catch phrases. But that's more a fault of the writers than the actors. They are doing their best to work with the material provided by the crack Hollywood hack team of Orci, Kurtzman and Lindelof.
If you love other bullshit Hollywood effects heavy nonsense then you'll eat this up with a plastic spoon. If you appreciate plot and character development, you'll find this slightly better than the rest of what the dream factory is crapping out.
Marianna Delfim
(removed by mod: please post in English)JackieGigantic
STAR TREK INTO (THE) DARKNESS (OF JJ ABRAMS ASSHOLE IN WHICH HIS HEAD RESIDES)Hey, I'm about to give away incredibly minor spoilers about a really shitty movie, aight? We cool? Kk, so, what the fuck was the point of revealing Benelict Cumberfatch as Khan? Was it that they realized they had what was ultimately a bland, uninteresting movie and decided they wanted to draw parallels to the best movie in the Star Trek series? Why would they do this? Why DID they do this? It held zero weight in the story, Benerdick Cumbersnatch could have been anyone, he didn't really have a character at all aside from "every vague anti-hero trope in a bag, regardless of whether they conflict or not". But hey, the writing team on this movie is pretty much all-star in the "fucking mediocre" category, see one Roberto Orci.
So the new Star Trek movie is an explicit metaphor for the War On Terror, because that's still topical, poignant, and hasn't been done to death. Except, you know, not. "War is morally ambiguous, bro". Oh, gee, thanks, I get that Star Trek Into Darkness. "Sometimes people start a war for their OWN GAIN, dude". Gosh, really? Thanks Star Trek Into Darkness. "Hey, check out this totally unnecessary and completely unsubtle character clearly moulded after Dick Cheney". Wow, Star Treck Into Darkness, how fucking risque. Why do all blockbuster science fiction movies these days have to come with a tired and out-dated message? Maybe it would have been all the things it wanted to be if it was released a decade ago, but the War On Terror has hardly been in the news for years and there hasn't been a single voice in mainstream media who hasn't treaded over the "ulterior motives" discussion - it just isn't relevant any longer. Just give me more Benerdick Cumbersnatch to drool over and less of this script culled from the journal of a beatnik political sciences major.
There are some good things in this movie aside from Bennyback Chumbawumba, don't get me wrong - the action is actually very well shot and choreographed. This isn't some disorienting, unstructured Michael Bay shit, JJ Abrams ACTUALLY knows how to shoot greatm fluid action and those scenes come together really well. Sadly for him, however, his name will never be synonymous with "shoots great action scenes" because it's already too well associated with "massive fucking letdown".
Blennyham Kumquat.
JoyceHeinen
Benedict Cumberbatch is fantastic in this movie, just his voice alone makes me shiver. He's a believable villain and Cumberbatch can make anything sound sinister. And Zachary Quinto's timing and dry humor is also fabulous.Siskoid
Long review: http://siskoid.blogspot.ca/2013/09/star-trek-1451-star-trek-into-darkness.htmlinvisiblecities
it was so boring.IreneAdler
Loved this movie just as much as the first part, or maybe even a bit more. I can only repeat about the cast what I said about them in the first movie - they fit their roles perfectly.Benedict Cumberbatch is amazing as Khan, he really added a very dark component to the movie. The dialogs (especially between Kirk and Spock, but also in general) were really funny. Furthermore some scenes were visually very interesting as well as thrilling, e.g. the very beginning of the movie among others.
Lovely, I really enjoy watching this every time.
muddi900
An uninspired sequel to one of the best blockbusters of all time, which is also a half-assed and badly remake of one of the supposedly best entries in the franchise. Mind-numbingly boring.Rigters
Loved Sherlock. That is enough!Ok, good movie!
Zeltaebar
Shaky Cam and CGI delivers anothern modern blockbuster. The tense music, the shaky camera and the fast cuts/editing shouts at me: Look! These action sequences are amazing. I don't feel it in my heart though. Looks and feels like it tries to manipulate me. Hard to get into. I would like to submerge myself in this story - parts of it is really intriguing - but the action is as usual a big turn off. Strange how they put so much emphasize on the action, considering Star Trek is all about ideas and characters - which used to be more appealing.aeng
good, but the original is a thousand times better.boulderman
lens flare (bore) festShowing items 1 – 15 of 46