Check
- Mark movie as favorite
- Dislike this movie
- Add movie to watchlist
- Mark movie as owned
- Check movie
- View the official lists that include The Act of Seeing with One's Own Eyes
- Visit IMDb page
The Act of Seeing with One's Own Eyes (1971)
Pssst, want to check out The Act of Seeing with One's Own Eyes in our new look?
Information
- Year
- 1971
- Runtime
- 32 min.
- Director
- Stan Brakhage
- Genres
- Horror, Documentary, Short
- Rating *
- 7.1
- Votes *
- 1,257
- Checks
- 1,392
- Favs
- 86
- Dislikes
- 36
- Favs/checks
- 6.2% (1:16)
- Favs/dislikes
- 2:1
Top comments
-
Wise Jake
Remarkable and disturbing. A stare into the face of death - a realization of the body as a mere shell. 14 years ago -
criscoJovan
Fascinating.
Not an easy one to stomach.
I recommend viewing in silence. 11 years 8 months ago -
the3rdman
For me, this film illustrated the tension between seeing, i.e. viewing objects from a subject position, and (for lack of better terms) sensibility or identification. On the one hand, there is a voyeuristic interest in seeing the human bodies dissected, deconstructed, and revealed to the observing eye. But instead of our own eye, we follow the eye of Brakhage's camera, so a certain distance is created that makes the experience somewhat more abstract. The extreme closeups for example achieve an almost purely visual aesthetic that only incorporates (again, for lack of a better term) the ethical or emotional by our own associations--what do these images mean to us when we recall that they are the bodies of human beings much like ourselves? Of course, it is these associations that tend to impress upon the viewer a sense of horror and of mortality, because we identify the bodies with our own to some extent. Their facelessness, however, creates distance; they are our own bodies but they are also not our own. At many times I began to think of them simply as things; and yet when Brakhage inserts footage of the careful cataloging of personal effects (for instance) I am reminded that they were recently living persons. I guess a large part of the film is about our relation to the body, one that seems ultimately ambiguous. These bodies are hard to relate to. Where is the spark that made them human?
The irony is that what we have here is not "the act of seeing with one's own eyes," but rather a mediated seeing that substitutes the camera's eye for our own. Instead of observing what we will, we follow the trajectory of Brakhage's editing. I can't help but think that this distance is an important part of Brakhage's project. Is it something like the distance we seem to require when confronting mortality and fear? Or the distance one maintain's between oneself, the living subject, and the other? Can this distance be closed? How? What happens if it is? What happens if it cannot? 10 years 7 months ago
Friends
Login to see which of your friends have seen this movie!In 9 official lists
-
This movie ranks #2 in BFI's 100 Documentary Films
BFI's 100 Documentary Fi…
2 -
This movie ranks #27 in TSPDT's Brief Encounters
TSPDT's Brief Encounters
27 -
This movie ranks #95 in Anthology Film Archives's Essential Cinema
Anthology Film Archives'…
95 -
This movie ranks #101 in Sight & Sound's The Greatest Documentaries of All Time
Sight & Sound's The Grea…
101 -
This movie ranks #121 in TSPDT's 1,000 Greatest Films: 1001-2500
TSPDT's 1,000 Greatest F…
121 -
This movie ranks #207 in The Criterion Collection
The Criterion Collection
207 -
This movie ranks #479 in Amos Vogel's Film as a Subversive Art
Amos Vogel's Film as a S…
479 -
This movie ranks #610 in Jonathan Rosenbaum's Essential Cinema
Jonathan Rosenbaum's Ess…
610 -
This movie ranks #987 in Sight & Sound's The Greatest Films of All Time
Sight & Sound's The Grea…
987