Order by:

Add your comment

Do you want to let us know what you think? Just login, after which you will be redirected back here and you can leave your comments.

Comments 1 - 6 of 6

ClassicLady's avatar

ClassicLady

Not as good as I expected it to be but still, a very good movie. Like Metropolis before it and many other H. G. Wells stories, way ahead of its time.
8 years 3 months ago
epp's avatar

epp

Way ahead of it's time. Even though we didn't had to wait until 2036 for our first trip to the moon.
9 years 10 months ago
Siskoid's avatar

Siskoid

Things to Come is not H.G. Wells' most subtle work, and as a film, it makes for a demagogic experience. Made in 1936, it almost eerily gets things right by having a second World War start in 1940, but then of course goes on a different track as the war drags on for decades and destroys civilization. It is then rebuilt by reasonable scientists and engineers and 100 year from the the film's "now", this new society launches its first ship into space amidst controversy. So it's difficult to follow characters for any length of time, if you can really call them characters. They are mostly sermon delivery devices there to make socialist points. But then this is a symbolist work, taking place in a place called Everytown, and as time grinds on, the montages owe a lot to Eisenstein's own demagogic films. When the film really shines is the special effects, combining models and live footage in a spectacle of a quality not seen since Metropolis. But bold visuals aside, it's more a lecture than a story.
3 years 7 months ago
daisyaday's avatar

daisyaday

color version streaming now on Anazon
4 years 2 months ago
Armoreska's avatar

Armoreska

watched it in Virtual Extended Version, approx. 140 minutes long, which is half-movie-half-book
the shorter cuts must be very disjointed
7 years 9 months ago
daisyaday's avatar

daisyaday

http://www.archive.org/details/ClaCinOnl_ThingsToCome
10 years 2 months ago
View comments