Order by:

Add your comment

Do you want to let us know what you think? Just login, after which you will be redirected back here and you can leave your comments.

Comments 1 - 15 of 17

jlfitz's avatar

jlfitz

streaming on Disney
2 years 1 month ago
TiRex's avatar

TiRex

I hated the original. At least this one is watchable.
2 years 1 month ago
Alias's avatar

Alias

*takes out cigar* Spielbergs' still got it, baby!
2 years 1 month ago
greenhorg's avatar

greenhorg

My first thought when watching the beautiful candy-colored musicals of the 50s and 60s is always "Great, but can't it be ugly?" Like can we wash out most of the color, and give it kind of a muddy digital feel. Also where are the fucking lens flares? So I was pretty much thrilled with this aesthetically enhanced update to the 1961 classic. Although I was disappointed Spielberg did not switch to comic sans for the title font.
1 year 11 months ago
Zuma's avatar

Zuma

Documentary on lens flare. How to add it to almost every scene, every discussion, every character's face as they are talking. All the time, every time.

Still way better than the original.
2 years 1 month ago
gulliver's avatar

gulliver

A shame using so much money on a movie that feels so stale. Cardboard hoodlums.. gang rape stopped by elderly lady LOL. And what about the butch lesbian that are like a ninja. Was that suppose to be inclusive. Suppose Spielberg did not approve of modern musicals (even most Bollywood films feels more contemporary the this).
11 months ago
Caerus's avatar

Caerus

At a high level everything about this is a great - performances, cinematography, and of course music.

Unfortunately it's a remake of a still-beloved musical from 60 years ago which brings along a lot of extra baggage - namely why does this exist?

The entire pitch of this movie seems to be "we noticed some problematic portrayals of race in a 60 year old movie, lets redo it". I really don't get the decision to only fix those; but not update the movie to reflect all of the other social changes that occurred in the mean time. If it had been set in the modern day with updated plots this movie could have actually become something interesting; instead of a movie that is still set in 1957 with a weird mishmash of 1957 and 2021 values.

We're left with a movie that is technically excellent but never really makes a case for coming out in 2021.
2 years ago
dantheman89's avatar

dantheman89

Unnecessary
2 years 4 months ago
boulderman's avatar

boulderman

It's long and it felt long. Spielberg likes 20th Century 'eras '. I didn't think it needed a remake. It's 'bright' but I'd liked to have escaped into something more novel
9 months 2 weeks ago
chunkylefunga's avatar

chunkylefunga

Not a bad remake, just not really needed.

Nice to see Latinos actually used for latino roles.

To those saying it's annoying that the Spanish wasn't subtitled. That's the point guys.
2 years 1 month ago
Matt Addis's avatar

Matt Addis

Doesn’t really add much besides sleeker production and a lot of unnecessary lens flare. Everything great about this movie was what was already inherently great about the musical. The original is still superior
2 years 1 month ago
frankqb's avatar

frankqb

Overflowing with Spielberg's stylistic panache and vivacious visuals, the West Side Story remake also manages to look decidedly retro in its film quality. The only problem is that Spielberg doesn't seem to have the flair for musical theatre choreography's blocking requirements on screen. So many times the musical flourishes paired with choreographed visuals were only half seen or underwhelming.

Is the movie enjoyable? Yes. Is it better than the original? No.

4 stars out of 5
2 years 1 month ago
nowhereman136's avatar

nowhereman136

About as well as a remake of an already great movie could be. Everything about this movie was great, and added just enough to stand out from the original film without feeling unnecessary. Spielberg should do more Musicals.

9/10
2 years 4 months ago
baraka92's avatar

baraka92

Well, I do think it's better than the original, even though I wrote a comment back in December saying the opposite. After watching it a couple of times in the theater I changed my mind. Wise's version is still great. Both can coexist since Spielberg's approach is different by being more grounded. These are some of the best changes:

- No parents (in the '61 version they are mentioned... and alive! but add absolutely nothing).
- Lt. Schrank exposition at the beginning.
- Riff is more nuanced and tragic (Faist is the Oscar snub of the year IMO).
- Rita Moreno as Doc's widow.
- The gun getting introduced naturally to the plot.
- Cool (it works better as part of the story, even though I still prefer the intensity of the choreography in the original).
- Somewhere.
- Amping up the tragedy. Spielberg really went with it. spoiler It's just heartbreaking.

The only things I didn't like were I Feel Pretty (the number on its own is sweet but even Sondheim admitted the irony of its placement didn't work) and America (It's not bad but they seemed very conscious that it's such an iconic song and stuff).

Finally, I thought this was going to change for home viewing but it didn't. As someone who speaks both spanish and english, I think Spielberg's decision to not add subtitles is misguided if not outright stupid. I love when the native language of a character is respected. That was enough. I HATE using this term, but this is some PC mental gymnastics that don't make sense in any way. Imagine Tarantino doing the same for Inglorious Basterds. Subtitles are good Steven.

Besides that... Great! Great movie!
2 years 1 month ago
Advent's avatar

Advent

Steven Spielberg out here doing the impossible.
2 years 4 months ago

Showing items 1 – 15 of 17

View comments